Message Board

Respected readers, authors and reviewers, you can add comments to this page on any questions about the contribution, review, editing and publication of this journal. We will give you an answer as soon as possible. Thank you for your support!

Full name
E-mail
Phone number
Title
Message
Verification Code
LUAN Sheng, JIN Wu, KONG Jie, LUO Kun, MENG Xianhong, ZHANG Tianshi, WANG Qingyin. Genetic evaluation and investment appraisal of the multi-trait selection breeding program in Chinese shrimp Fenneropenaeus chinensis[J]. Haiyang Xuebao, 2013, 35(2): 133-142. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253 4193.2013.02.014
Citation: LUAN Sheng, JIN Wu, KONG Jie, LUO Kun, MENG Xianhong, ZHANG Tianshi, WANG Qingyin. Genetic evaluation and investment appraisal of the multi-trait selection breeding program in Chinese shrimp Fenneropenaeus chinensis[J]. Haiyang Xuebao, 2013, 35(2): 133-142. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253 4193.2013.02.014

Genetic evaluation and investment appraisal of the multi-trait selection breeding program in Chinese shrimp Fenneropenaeus chinensis

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253 4193.2013.02.014
  • Received Date: 2012-05-02
  • Rev Recd Date: 2012-09-26
  • The genetic gain and economic benefit from a multi-trait breeding scheme with Chinese shrimp (Fenneropenaeus chinensis) were calculated after performing 20 selections. The breeding object was made up of harvest body weight (BW), survival rate (SR) and feed intake (FI), but the trait FI was not included in the selection index. Selection response and genetic gain of the breeding object were estimated based on selection index theory. Economic benefit was predicted after nucleus shrimp was multiplied by a pyramid breeding structure (nucleus, multiplication and production populations). The sensitivity of profit (RP) and benefit/cost ratio (BCR) to a number of factors were examined. It comprises biological parameters (heritability value, accounting for feed intake), economic parameters (price of shrimp, price of feed, discount rate, initial investment, annual cost), and operational parameters (the year when first return occurs, multiplication efficiency). For the base situation, selection responses on BW, SR and FI were 0.81 g,1.41% and 1.30 g, respectively; their economic values were CNY 32, CNY 20 and CNY-8, respectively; the overall gain in economic units for the breeding object was CNY 43.69; the RP and BCR of this program were CNY 8 660.99 and 14.34 after preforming 20 selections. Heritability values had a moderate effect for RP and BCR. Greater heritabilities resulted in greater RP and BCR. The RP and BCR were greater than those of base situation when the economic value of FI was set as 0. RP and BCR were sensitive to the change of the shrimp price. The changes from the feed price, discounted rate and annual cost had a relatively small effect on RP and BCR. Initial investment also had a small effect on RP, but had a great effect on BCR. Delays in obtaining the first return in this program resulted in reduced EB and BCR. However, the greatest contribution to variations in RP and BCR came from the improvements in the multiplication efficiency at the level of both the nucleus and the hatcheries. High multiplication efficiency could be achieved by use of the high fecundity and the pyramid industry structure in Chinese shrimp. RP and BCR were increased by 1 866.92% and 1 736.75% when the production population was multiplied by 1 736.15%.
  • loading
  • Gjedrem T. The first family-based breeding program in aquaculture[J]. Reviews in Aquaculture, 2010, 2(1): 2—15.
    Khaw H L, Ponzoni R W, Danting M J C. Estimation of genetic change in the GIFT strain of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) by comparing contemporary progeny produced by males born in 1991 or in 2003[J]. Aquaculture, 2008, 275(1/4): 64—69.
    Gjedrem T. The first family-based breeding program in aquaculture[J]. Reviews in Aquaculture, 2010, 2(1): 2—15.
    Thodesen J, Grisdale-Helland B, Helland S J, et al. Feed intake, growth and feed utilization of offspring from wild and selected Atlantic salmon(Salmo salar)[J]. Aquaculture, 1999, 180(3/4): 237—246.
    孟宪红. 中国对虾"黄海2号"对WSSV的抗病性分析. 青岛: 中国海洋大学, 2010.
    Hazel L N. The genetic basis for constructing selection indices[J]. Genetics, 1943, 28(6): 476—490.
    Harris D L, Newman S. Breeding for profit: synergism between genetic improvement and livestock production (a review)[J]. Journal of animal science, 1994, 72(8): 2178.
    黄锡霞. 超细型细毛羊优化育种规划的研究. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2005.
    Hill W G. Prediction and evaluation of response to selection with overlapping generations[J]. Animal Production, 1974, 18(2): 117—139.
    Gjedrem T, Baranski M. Selective Breeding in Aquaculture: An Introduction[M]. Dordrecht Heidelberg London New York: Springer, 2009.
    Ponzoni R W, Nguyen H N, Khaw H L. Investment appraisal of genetic improvement programs in Nile tilapia[J]. Aquaculture, 2007, 269(1/4): 187—199.
    Ponzoni R W, Nguyen N H, Khaw H L, et al. Accounting for genotype by environment interaction in economic appraisal of genetic improvement programs in common carp Cyprinus carpio[J]. Aquaculture, 2008, 285(1/4): 47—55.
    Argue B J, Arce S M, Lotz J M, et al. Selective breeding of Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) for growth and resistance to Taura Syndrome Virus[J]. Aquaculture, 2002, 204(3/4): 447—460.
    杨翠华. 中国对虾与抗性相关性状的遗传学参数分析. 青岛: 中国海洋大学, 2007.
    张天时. 中国对虾(Fenneropenaeus chinensis)育种的模型分析与遗传参数评估. 青岛: 中国海洋大学, 2010.
    田燚,孔杰,杨翠华. 中国对虾 2 个群体杂交子一代生长和存活率比较[J]. 科学通报, 2006, 51(15): 1771—1774.
    栾生,孔杰,张天时,等. 基于表型值和育种值的中国对虾生长、抗逆性状相关分析[J]. 海洋水产研究, 2008, 29(3): 14—20.
    Rutten M, Bijma P, Woolliams J A, et al. SelAction: Software to predict selection response and rate of inbreeding in livestock breeding programs[J]. Journal of Heredity, 2002, 93(6): 456—458.
    Harris D L. Breeding for efficiency in livestock production: defining the economic objectives[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 1970, 30(6): 860—865.
    张沅. 家畜育种规划[M]. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 2000.
    曹洪战. 优质猪选育方案优化研究. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2003.
    李俊雅. 中国西门塔尔牛开放核心群优化育种规划的研究. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2002.
    Bulmer M G. The effect of selection on genetic variability[J]. The American Naturalist, 1971, 105(943): 201—211.
    Meuwissen T H E. Reduction of selection differentials in finite populations with a nested full-half sib family structure[J]. Biometrics, 1991, 47(1): 195—203.
    Neely K G, Myers J M, Hard J J, et al. Comparison of growth, feed intake, and nutrient efficiency in a selected strain of coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) and its source stock[J]. Aquaculture, 2008, 283(1): 134—140.
    Thodesen J, Grisdale-Helland B, Helland S J, et al. Feed intake, growth and feed utilization of offspring from wild and selected Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar)[J]. Aquaculture, 1999, 180(3/4): 237—246.
    Mambrini M, Labb E L, Randriamanantsoa F, et al. Response of growth-selected brown trout (Salmo trutta) to challenging feeding conditions[J]. Aquaculture, 2006, 252(2): 429—440.
    Poutous M, Vissac B. Recherche théorique des conditions de rentabilité maximum de l'épreuve de descendance des taureaux d'insémination artificielle[J]. Annl Zootech, 1962, 11: 233—256.
    Bird P, Mitchell G, Others. The choice of discount rate in animal breeding investment appraisal[J]. Animal breeding abstracts, 1980, 48(8): 499—505.
    农业部渔业局. 2011年中国渔业统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2011.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Article views (1756) PDF downloads(1034) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return